Project

General

Profile

Bug #9050

Persistence preset: additional software

Added by BitingBird almost 5 years ago. Updated over 3 years ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
-
Category:
Persistence
Target version:
-
Start date:
03/14/2015
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Feature Branch:
Type of work:
Code
Blueprint:
Starter:
No
Affected tool:
Additional Software Packages

Description

Right now, the additional software feature exists, but it's not shown in the persistence configuration. It should be added. When selected, it should open a windows with warnings (cf https://tails.boum.org/doc/advanced_topics/additional_software) and let you enter the list of packages you want.

This is the easier version of #5996

Team: alan, sajolida, reviewer (?)


Related issues

Related to Tails - Feature #5996: Additional software configuration GUI Duplicate

History

#1 Updated by BitingBird almost 5 years ago

  • Related to Feature #5996: Additional software configuration GUI added

#2 Updated by BitingBird almost 5 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#3 Updated by sajolida over 4 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Target version set to 2016

#4 Updated by sajolida over 4 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#5 Updated by sajolida over 4 years ago

  • Related to Bug #9059: "Additional software" locks the opening of the desktop added

#6 Updated by sajolida over 4 years ago

  • Related to deleted (Bug #9059: "Additional software" locks the opening of the desktop)

#7 Updated by sajolida over 4 years ago

  • Affected tool set to Additional Software Packages

#8 Updated by intrigeri over 3 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2016 to 2017

It's not clear if this exactly what a team volunteered to work on in 2017 (#5996, #9059, #9819) but in any case that's not 2016 material anymore.

#9 Updated by sajolida over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Confirmed to Rejected
  • Target version deleted (2017)

The UX proposed by BitingBird was meant to be an "easier version of #5996" but, while working on #5996, nobody in the team ever considered this as an option. So I'm rejecting this idea.

Also available in: Atom PDF