Project

General

Profile

Feature #16830

Feature #16096: Donation campaign 2019

Rework the way "one-time" and "monthly" are coded on our donation page

Added by sajolida about 1 month ago. Updated 12 days ago.

Status:
In Progress
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Fundraising
Target version:
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Feature Branch:
web/16830-better-monthly-radio
Type of work:
Website
Blueprint:
Starter:
Affected tool:

Description

Right-now "monthly" is the default because it's more valuable to us but it might be surprising to the user and badly interpreted, especially if overlooked.

Could we have a mechanism that forces them to make a decision, without previous default? This would require some JavaScript.


Related issues

Blocked by Tails - Feature #16189: Do usability testing on our donation page Confirmed 12/04/2018

History

#1 Updated by sajolida 26 days ago

  • Assignee set to sajolida
  • Target version set to Tails_3.15

#2 Updated by sajolida 25 days ago

  • Status changed from Confirmed to Needs Validation
  • Assignee changed from sajolida to u
  • Feature Branch set to web/16830-better-monthly-radio

Here is a branch. Please have a look.

It's based on #16170 so we'll have to merge web/16170-other-ways-above-fold first.

It moves "Other ways to donate" up by only 9 pixels which is not a lot compared to what we gained in #16170.

In the no-JS version, I detected that we're giving a "Custom amount" option for one-time donations but not for recurring donations. Testing all this is a pain once you get to PayPal so I decided to give up on this. Maybe there's a reason for that. Feel free to investigate it deeper if you think it's worth it.

#3 Updated by u 18 days ago

Hm, I don't share your assessment that this might be surprising to the user because we clearly highlight the preselected options visually.

Now, not having a preselected option makes it harder for people to donate, because they will have to click to make a selection, which seems to be contrary to the "don't make me think" UX principle IMO.

Also, compared to web/16170-other-ways-above-fold it looks like you make these currently visible green buttons hardly visible, by visually degrading them to a radio button.

Hence right now I would not want to merge this as is. What do you think? Or did my website build script somehow get it wrong?

#4 Updated by u 14 days ago

  • Assignee changed from u to sajolida

#5 Updated by CyrilBrulebois 12 days ago

  • Target version changed from Tails_3.15 to Tails_3.16

#6 Updated by sajolida 12 days ago

  • Status changed from Needs Validation to In Progress
  • Target version changed from Tails_3.16 to Tails_3.17

So your intuition and mine differ and we don't have actual user data to prove anything. So I'll put this on wait until I do some usability testing on this page.

- Regarding the "don't make me think" argument, right now if they don't "think", the "monthly" option will be preselected for them which might not be what most people expect. I would personally feel tricked if I end up configuring a monthly donation because I didn't pay attention or didn't understand the state of the button that is preselected. It also requires a PayPal account. So I'm tempted to say that with the current state of things, people actually have to think a tiny bit more.
- Regarding the new buttons being "hardly visible", I'm using the default style for radio buttons which I also thought would be more straightforward at making it clear that people have to choose one of the options, than our current custom buttons. For example, they might very well have accessibility issues since they <a href="https://www.w3.org/WAI/tips/designing/#dont-use-color-alone-to-convey-information">use color alone to convey information</a>.

But let's not argue more based on assumptions: if my fears are founded, they will show up in the usability tests.

#7 Updated by sajolida 12 days ago

  • Blocked by Feature #16189: Do usability testing on our donation page added

Also available in: Atom PDF