Project

General

Profile

Bug #15763

Upgrade to Linux 4.17

Added by intrigeri 10 months ago. Updated 8 months ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Elevated
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Target version:
Start date:
08/04/2018
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
0.50 h
QA Check:
Pass
Feature Branch:
feature/15763-linux-4.17
Type of work:
Code
Blueprint:
Starter:
Affected tool:

Description

linux-image-amd64 in sid now depends on linux-image-4.17.0-1-amd64. Sooner or later 4.16 will be removed from sid and it won't have security support in Debian anymore, so if we don't upgrade to 4.17 in Tails 3.9, we'll probably have to do that in one of the following bugfix releases, which feels a bit scary.


Related issues

Blocks Tails - Feature #15334: Core work 2018Q3: Foundations Team Resolved 02/20/2018

Associated revisions

Revision 280ab9b4 (diff)
Added by intrigeri 10 months ago

Upgrade Linux to 4.17 and aufs4 to its current aufs4.17 branch (refs: #15763)

Revision d9033ef9 (diff)
Added by intrigeri 9 months ago

Upgrade Linux to 4.17.0-2 (refs: #15763).

Revision d71bf5fc
Added by intrigeri 9 months ago

Merge commit '58c096b39962d6eac7b52f5be3aa2887efc947a6' into devel (refs: #15763).

Revision 0506ce79
Added by intrigeri 9 months ago

Merge branch 'feature/15763-linux-4.17' into devel (Fix-committed: #15763)

History

#1 Updated by intrigeri 10 months ago

  • Feature Branch set to feature/15763-linux-4.17

#2 Updated by intrigeri 10 months ago

  • Status changed from Confirmed to In Progress
  • % Done changed from 0 to 10

#3 Updated by intrigeri 10 months ago

  • Assignee changed from intrigeri to segfault
  • % Done changed from 10 to 50
  • Estimated time set to 0.50 h
  • QA Check set to Ready for QA

I've seen all automated test suite scenarios pass. 0.5 hour should be enough for a quick code review and booting the ISO on 1 bare metal machine. If you want to, and can, test on more hardware than this, feel free to do so up to 1h (total).

#4 Updated by segfault 9 months ago

  • Assignee changed from segfault to intrigeri
  • % Done changed from 50 to 100
  • QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Pass

Works on my hardware (I could only test one machine)

#5 Updated by intrigeri 9 months ago

  • % Done changed from 100 to 90
  • QA Check changed from Pass to Dev Needed

Thanks. I've merged the state you've reviewed into devel.

Unfortunately (not really but well) a new src:linux was uploaded with an ABI bump and thus the package name changed => pushed another commit to pick it up. Note that if that package had been updated in Debian with no ABI bump between your review and the freeze, we would have silently & blindly taken this upgrade. So I won't request another review and will only test this on my local hardware + run the full automated test suite before merging.

#6 Updated by intrigeri 9 months ago

intrigeri wrote:

So I won't request another review and will only test this on my local hardware + run the full automated test suite before merging.

Full test suite results look good: all green on my local Jenkins except one scenario that always fails here but passes on lizard, and each individual scenario passed at least once accross the 2 full runs on lizard (each of these runs having 1-3 failures, which is pretty good).

#7 Updated by intrigeri 9 months ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Fix committed
  • Assignee deleted (intrigeri)
  • % Done changed from 90 to 100
  • QA Check changed from Dev Needed to Pass

Works on 2 laptops, merged.

#8 Updated by intrigeri 9 months ago

  • Status changed from Fix committed to In Progress

#9 Updated by intrigeri 9 months ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Fix committed

#10 Updated by intrigeri 9 months ago

  • Status changed from Fix committed to Resolved

#11 Updated by segfault 8 months ago

#12 Updated by segfault 8 months ago

I assume this qualifies as FT work

#13 Updated by intrigeri 8 months ago

I assume this qualifies as FT work

Absolutely :)

Also available in: Atom PDF