Project

General

Profile

Feature #11447

Feature #5926: Freezable APT repository

Write design doc for the freezable APT repository

Added by intrigeri over 3 years ago. Updated over 3 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Infrastructure
Target version:
Start date:
05/18/2016
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Feature Branch:
feature/5926-freezable-APT-repository
Type of work:
Contributors documentation
Blueprint:
Starter:
Affected tool:

Related issues

Related to Tails - Feature #11444: Write contributors doc for the freezable APT repository Resolved 05/18/2016

Associated revisions

Revision 6d9264d6 (diff)
Added by intrigeri over 3 years ago

Freezable APT repo: document release managers' access.

refs: #11447

Revision 96ce97a0 (diff)
Added by intrigeri over 3 years ago

Freezable APT repo: document release managers' access.

refs: #11447

History

#1 Updated by intrigeri over 3 years ago

  • Copied from Feature #11444: Write contributors doc for the freezable APT repository added

#2 Updated by intrigeri over 3 years ago

  • Copied from deleted (Feature #11444: Write contributors doc for the freezable APT repository)

#3 Updated by intrigeri over 3 years ago

  • Parent task set to #5926

#4 Updated by intrigeri over 3 years ago

  • Related to Feature #11444: Write contributors doc for the freezable APT repository added

#5 Updated by intrigeri over 3 years ago

  • % Done changed from 10 to 20

I imported most of the content into wiki/src/contribute/APT_repository, but it's a bit messy, and I want to clean it up a bit. I would also like to describe the infrastructure side of things in a little bit more details.

#6 Updated by intrigeri over 3 years ago

  • Assignee changed from intrigeri to bertagaz
  • % Done changed from 20 to 30
  • QA Check set to Ready for QA

Actually I've re-read the entire thing and to me it seems it seems at least on par with our usual standards for such doc. bertagaz & anonym, can you please read it and tell me what's missing or unclear? I'll adjust things accordingly.

Starting points:

  • for the infra bits: wiki/src/contribute/working_together/roles/sysadmins.mdwn (I think that the Puppet code is pretty self-explaining, and the actual scripts and their usage are documented under wiki/src/contribute/APT_repository anyway)
  • for the rest of the design: wiki/src/contribute/APT_repository

#7 Updated by bertagaz over 3 years ago

  • Assignee changed from bertagaz to anonym
  • % Done changed from 30 to 60

intrigeri wrote:

Actually I've re-read the entire thing and to me it seems it seems at least on par with our usual standards for such doc. bertagaz & anonym, can you please read it and tell me what's missing or unclear? I'll adjust things accordingly.

Starting points:

  • for the infra bits: wiki/src/contribute/working_together/roles/sysadmins.mdwn (I think that the Puppet code is pretty self-explaining, and the actual scripts and their usage are documented under wiki/src/contribute/APT_repository anyway)
  • for the rest of the design: wiki/src/contribute/APT_repository

Read them, pushed a small minor syntax fix, apart from that it seems good and clear enough to me. Good documentation you did there!

Assigning to anonym, as you asked his opinion. I bet he already has read and checked most of them, shouldn't take him long. :)

#8 Updated by anonym over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
  • Assignee deleted (anonym)
  • % Done changed from 60 to 100
  • QA Check changed from Ready for QA to Pass

Their top quality! :)

Also available in: Atom PDF